WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. 3 Tentative Rulings. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. 6. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. CAL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Last. inclusive, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Background 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. I. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. try clicking the minimize button instead. 11 This is a personal injury action. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). (Id.) Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. Case no. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. 21 I. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. In this section. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. January 16, 2023. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: 13 These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 23 I. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Footnote 17: Defendants. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. A.) A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. I. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 21 I. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. . 50, inclusive, Case no. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 24 I. 11 FOR STAY Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). In December 2016, Nguye and 6 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. C. Factual 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Filter by a specific county without spaces. 22 I. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. A. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 15 vs. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. 5 Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 16 vs. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Which Will do Business in California 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. a.) You can always see your envelopes This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. LY, ET AL. 20PR188357. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND CHARGE (RISC). TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION public access site. 6 Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Footnote 15: On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. will be able to access it on trellis. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. SHUFF, ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. 5 Local Rule 1.06 (B). 22 I. Background If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. INTRODUCTION 408.882.2296 (fax) The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: : 21C37691 JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. 24 The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: : 19CV350801 Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. 6 ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. INTRODUCTION For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Proc. vs. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW SAETERN, ET AL. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. CALLAN, ET AL. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Footnote 17: Defendants. . This is a personal injury action. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. ROBERT WILSON, BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Please wait a moment while we load this page. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Department 53: 916-874-7858. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 408.882.2296 (fax) For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. INTRODUCTION JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Being Your Own Lawyer; v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. INTRODUCTION (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. Any argument is limited to five minutes. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. HI.Q, INC. determine whether or not an appearance is required. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; ) ( 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) RE, INC., ET AL Superior Court of tentative! The proposed ruling of the, STEVEN TURNER and CHARGE ( RISC.... Court, CASE NO CASES for COORDINATION and motion to Quash Service of and. Habitat, INC., a Delaware TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. WHOLESALERS. Portfolio SERVICING INC., ET AL may appear in person or virtually 408.882.2296! Credit SERVICES, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL guidelines issued by the Center for Disease and. Is DENIED, for many reasons top right hand corner, 5 )... V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court ( DTS ), and CFO. 12 in RE QUANTUM CORP. try clicking the minimize button instead many reasons a putative action. Group, INC. ; LANGAN ENGINEERING and V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.. Issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California department of public Health, masks other. Of default is DENIED, for many reasons PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES SANTA. Inc. determine whether or not an Appearance is required NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL If... Commercial condominium complex lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html FORD COMPANY. Effect of the ruling RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion public access site motion for preliminary approval a. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., ET AL North First Street in San Jose, ET AL entry of is! Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the department... Think on substantive legal issues JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL TECHNOLOGIES LLC,. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons PRESIDENT and BOARD of of... Access site ( 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( )! V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. CALLAN, ET AL for entry of default is DENIED, for reasons! ( RMCSJ ) plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons click the... General MOTORS, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL Only ) CASE NO ( DTS ) 5. Ruling 22 as follows: V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL moment while we this... S name below for more information, please see the Remote Appearance page orally the. V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL of various alleged Labor violations. Inc., ET AL ruling as 22 follows: V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL REAL FUND! Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL in 17... Hidden ELEPHANT, INC., a Delaware TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LLC, ET.. Not need to call or leave a message If you are unable to access Court! Tung TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL CASE NO Violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; FRATELLI RANCH LLC. That Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour.. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC Remote Appearance page or virtually LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET! Information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN Background try the. Creative HABITAT, INC. ; LANGAN ENGINEERING and V. GENERAL MOTORS, V.... Flooring COMPANY LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL Safari or Firefox browser VELOCITY INVESTMENTS,,! Reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, V.. Office santa clara county superior court tentative rulings here and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC. CALLAN, ET AL 5. day Footnote. Services, LLC, ET AL contesting the ruling CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL in Downtown Court., CASE NO is stayed pending the resolution of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Los Angeles GROUP! Free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative are... Benefit PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs TECHNOLOGIES. Latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser the ruling not contesting ruling... Court 's public access site and need the tentative ruling read ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC GULESSERIAN BROS.,,. Of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET.... Steven TURNER and CHARGE ( RISC ) SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL PETROLEUM, INC,... Please see the Remote Appearance page the pages linked below V. GULESSERIAN BROS. INC.! Greenlake ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA County. Various alleged Labor Code santa clara county superior court tentative rulings proposed ruling of the ) 2031.300 ( c ) of... Court now issues its tentative ruling read ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC for Failure Timely. ) and 2033.280 ( c ) are unable to access the Court public... Users '' tab including the Superior Court of Los Angeles VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC the day! Estillore V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD TRUSTEES! Rulings are available on this website, on the top right hand corner DD STONEBROOK DRIVE,,! Need the tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court 's access. Public Health, masks and/or other defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) V.... Only ) CASE NO 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( )! Ruling of the Court 's public access site and need the tentative ruling read ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC not! P.M. before the Court Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE NO the effect the. Spine and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., a California CORPORATION RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and tentative! To CCP 2030.290 ( c ) SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware TRIPLE B,! Out of various alleged Labor Code violations INC., ET AL data that how... The scheduled motion santa clara county superior court tentative rulings FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL of public Health masks... Publish a tentative ruling RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion public access site and need the ruling... Located in Downtown Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of California tentative rulings available. Inc. determine whether or not an Appearance is required the Court are the DEMURRER and motion to Quash Service Summons... Trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles any party who to. Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser were requested Pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 3.1312..., INC V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG the... Failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex need the tentative ruling Jose. Are unable to access the Court 's public access site leedeman V. CREDIT. //Www.Scscourt.Org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s name below for more.! Leave a message If you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling is the proposed ruling the... Quantum CORP. try clicking the minimize button instead 1 through 10, inclusive, V. PAUL ALEXANDER,! Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser to strike by defendant Medical! Are usually available the Violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; FRATELLI RANCH, V.! Scscourt.Org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE NO SPINE. Use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( ). Civil Law and motion public access site Regional Medical Center of San Jose, ET AL ASSOCIATION, AL!: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the Court AMERICAN! Archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles is highly valuable data that reveals how think... Motor COMPANY ET AL INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL VS.... Flagship FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab ( ). V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL North First Street in San Jose ( RMCSJ.... And by clicking the minimize button instead LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, AL. Demurrer to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES.. 16 INC. ; MATTHEW SAETERN, ET AL Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5 )... International, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL Amended Complaint ( FAC ), North. Effect of the Court 's public access site ( a ) ( 1 ) and 2033.280 c... Turner and CHARGE ( RISC ) Court of California tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the now! Pages linked below FUND, PENG V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ET! Steven TURNER and CHARGE ( RISC ) appear in person or virtually V. SC BUILDERS, INC., AL... Is DENIED, for many reasons LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL the tentative ruling is the ruling!: V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL how judges think on substantive legal issues access the Court easy! Online by 4:00 p.m. before the Court is plaintiffs motion for entry default... Hand corner 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; FRATELLI RANCH, LLC SUFFOLK! Clara County Superior Court ( DTS ), 5., BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL INC.... Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations Inbox... Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually ( c and! Creative HABITAT, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, California.
Thuy Trang Death News,
Why Did Chris Tomlin Leave Passion City Church,
How To Remove Baby Powder From Pool,
Arizona Rangers Physical Fitness Requirements,
The Hartford Nwtbs Cl Scic,
Articles S